U.S. Appeals Court: Trump Cannot Block Twitter Followers

NEW YORK/WASHINGTON, July 9 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump cannot block critics whose views he dislikes from following his Twitter account, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday.

In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment forbids Trump from using Twitter’s “blocking” function to limit access to his account, which is otherwise open to the public.

“The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise-open online dialog because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,” Circuit Judge Barrington Parker wrote.


Recommended For You

Postblazer Automation App Monthly

Automate your Postblazer content search and posting tasks

LeadFunnelCloud Starter

Get this Cloud Based App That Creates INSTANT Done-For-You UNLIMITED Profitable Lead Funnels To Build A HUGE List,Drive Targeted Social Traffic and Affiliate Commissions In Just 60 Seconds

MaticPress Group Chat

A powerful Wordpress-based live chat plugin for your entire team including customizable ability, capture/sync users name/email to autoresponders, user ban functionality, mobile responsiveness, and far more in a seamless live chat experience.


The White House and the U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Twitter had no immediate comment.

Trump has made his @RealDonaldTrump Twitter account a central, and controversial, part of his presidency, using it to promote his agenda, announce policies and attack critics. He has 61.8 million followers.

Tuesday’s decision upheld a May 2018 ruling by U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in Manhattan.

The Justice Department has called her ruling “fundamentally misconceived,” saying Trump used Twitter in his personal capacity to disseminate his views, not to offer a platform for public discussion.

Trump’s use of Twitter had been challenged by plaintiffs including the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. (Reporting by David Shepardson in Washington, D.C. and Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and David Gregorio)

Original Article : HERE ; Curated & posted using : RealSpecific

This post was curated & Posted using : RealSpecific

Thank you for taking the time to read our article.

If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.

And ... Don't forget to have fun!


LinkedIn Ads 2.0 Success Kit PLR

Get this Up-to-date "LinkedIn Ads 2.0 Success Kit PLR" with PLR Rights and start cashing in huge by selling it as your own.

Wp UltraPop Pro

The Pro Version includes an Unlimited License option ..

SyndLab 2.0 Pro

LIVE Case Study: Page 1 Rankings For BOTH Video and Niche Sites Made EASY With Automatic Social Syndication!

Leave a Reply